Mon 8.25.08
Today at Rattle.com we feature a pair of short poems by Damien Echols, who’s bio places him on death row in Arkansas for a crime he didn’t commit. As they say, everyone in prison is innocent–only Damien really is. If you’re unfamiliar with his story, watch Paradise Lost. If you support the death penalty, here are some facts:
- Since 1973, more than 125 people have been released from death rows throughout the country due to evidence of their wrongful convictions. In 2003 alone, 10 wrongfully convicted defendants were released from death row.
- A 2007 study of death sentences in Connecticut conducted by Yale University School of Law revealed that African-American defendants receive the death penalty at three times the rate of white defendants in cases where the victims are white.
- Ninety-five percent of death row inmates cannot afford their own attorney.
- Since the U.S. Supreme Court reinstated the death penalty in 1976, 80% of all executions have taken place in the South. The Northeast accounts for less than 2% of executions.
- In 2007, 88% of all known executions took place in five countries: China, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and the USA. Only four countries execute more of their citizens than the United States.
And so on, courtesy of Amnesty International.
But as horrific as capital punishment is on the whole, Damien Echols’ case is so much worse. You can read about it in detail here, but the gist is, three young boys were found brutally murdered in the woods in Arkansas. Despite there being no direct evidence linking Echols and his two younger friends to the murder, the investigation turned into a witch hunt in every sense of the word, the whole town panicking about satanic cults because these three outsiders dressed in black and listened to Metallica.
The police made a mess of the investigation, but coerced a confession out of Jessie Misskelley, Echols’ developmentally disabled friend. The interrogation lasted 12 hours, without the boys parents or lawyer present — only 46 minutes were recorded. The D.A. then gave Misskelley the option of testifying against his friends to reduce his sentence, but he refused, saying that the confession wasn’t true. But that was enough in this backward town for the jury to convict.
There’s much more to the case, including one victim’s crazy father having a knife with the boy’s blood on it and the biggest joke of an expert witness you’ll ever see, but you’ll have to watch the documentaries. They’re worth it.
What stands out more than anything is that, even as a 17-year-old, Echols is the most intelligent person in that courtroom. At one point he references the Salem Witch Trials, and everyone in the room gasps — he must be a witch! Echols is a thoughtful, articulate, inquisitive young man, in a town where that’s not the norm. With a mind like his, it’s no surprise he became a poet.
The chilling thing is that this could happen to anyone — any of us could find ourselves in the wrong place at the wrong time, and be left to the mercy of a failed justice system. If Echols could have afforded a defense, he wouldn’t be fighting for his life right now.
What’s more, if HBO didn’t happen to bring their cameras into the courtroom, we’d have no idea that this had happened. Maybe Echols would still have these poems in Rattle, but the line about his innocence would seem just as specious as they usually do. Margaret Cho, Marilyn Manson, Eddie Vedder, and even Bill Clinton support Echols–but how many people are rotting in jail right now, facing the same injustice without the same kind of exposure?
More horrific than the West Memphis Three are all those ghosts they stand for, the thousands of people wrongly convicted before The Innocence Project and DNA testing could set them free.







August 25th, 2008 at 6:49 pm
Thanks for posting this, Tim. I have never seen Paradise Lost, but I did teach the book Devil’s Knot: The True Story of the West Memphis Three by Mara Leveritt — a bit dated by 2008, but still a great read into this case.
August 25th, 2008 at 8:43 pm
LOL….Devil’s knot…the true story!!!???? that’s a laugh….you’d be better off reading “The Blood of Innocents” which is a lot closer to the truth….or you could just read the actual court documents which actually prove that they did way more than just wear black and listen to Metallica. That’s what I would suggest you do if you are TRULY searching for the truth in this case.
August 25th, 2008 at 10:05 pm
Way more, as in taking out a book on black magic and calling himself a Wiccan like a million other teenagers were doing in the ’90s? I haven’t read “The Blood of Innocents”, but if you know of any evidence linking those three boys to the crime that wasn’t either ‘lost’ by the police or recanted by the witnesses, I’d love to hear it.
And what of the new DNA evidence showing that someone other than the convicted and the killed was at the crime scene? Do you think there’s a 4th boy involved in the cult?
In other words “onlythefacts,” give me a break. Even Byers thinks Echols is innocent at this point:
“I believe I would be the last person on the face of the earth that people would expect or dream to see say free the West Memphis 3,” said Byers. “From looking at the evidence and the facts that were presented to me, I have no doubt the West Memphis 3 are innocent.”
http://www.wreg.com/Global/story.asp?S=7304775
August 25th, 2008 at 11:25 pm
Ha, even Guy Reel, the author of “Blood of Innocents” has reservations about his own book. This is from his updated postscript:
“…given the void of evidence in this case – and developments since the trials – Echols’ contentions [of innocence] may merit another look.”
Reel was a local hack journalist trying to ride the wave of sensationalism into a national best seller. The book has been so fully discredited as to barely be worth mentioning as a footnote to this story, and ironically might even speak more in support of Echols’ story than anything else in print. This is how easy it is to start a witch hunt.
I have a strong suspicion that you’re the same person who’s offended by Kay Ryan’s sexual persuasion. Care to confirm?
August 26th, 2008 at 7:52 am
Well, instead of spewing senseless garbage from silly books with huge agenda…..the “way more” that I was referring to were the facts. let’s read the facts from some health facilities who have dealt with “poor” Damien shall we:
5/7/92. E. Arkansas Mental Health Center: Clinical report based on psychological tests: The behavior of this youngster is characterized by impulsive hostility…the desire to gain power and demean others springs from animosity and a wish to vindicate past grievances. This teenager believes that past degradations may be undone by provoking fear and intimidation in others. Cool and distant, this youth demonstrates little or no compassion for others.
6/1/92 Charter Hospital of Little Rock: Admits to a history of violence and attempting to scratch out the eyes of a classmate. There were major concerns that Damien was exhibiting disturbed thinking. He has a history of extreme physical aggression toward others. It was felt that he needed to be temporarily removed from his environment to provide protection for him and protection for others.
Damien states, “I burn myself with lighters. I have huffed gas and paint, used speed, marijuana, glue, and alcohol.”
9/2/92 St. Vincent’s Hospital in Oregon: Suicidal, threatening family, drug use. Parental concerns regarding satanism, devil worship.
Emergency Room report: The patient denies suicidal or homicidal ideation at this time. However, in talking with the family members, they state that he made it quite clear that he had thought of harming other people, i.e. was going to cut the throat of his mother and has said so in the past, and also made verbal threats to his father here at St. Vincent’s Hospital.
Admission Diagnosis: Suicidal/homicidal ideation.
Mother and father state that he has sniffed propane, glue, gasoline and almost any other drug that is possible, but he denies that, especially over the last four years.
Physician’s Progress Report: Because of Damien’s threats, both parents do not feel that they wish to have him return to their home. They are frightened of him and what he can do, not only to them but to the other children who reside in the home (2 others). Damien is to return to Arkansas by bus.
9/14/92 Charter Hospital: Damien reportedly threatened to kill and eat his father while in Oregon. He admitted to sucking the blood out of a peer’s neck.
9/92 Progress notes: Belief in devil worship, has agreed to threatening to “kill” others. Bizarre behaviors. Stated he had attempted suicide before and “wasn’t worried about trying again, because I know I can come back.”
Peers complaining of Damien making growling sounds at them.
Damien continuing to make bizarre sounds around peers, but where staff can’t hear him. Continues talk of satanism.
Continues laughing strangely and getting peers to feed into his satanism. Tries to keep staff from seeing him do anything other than what’s appropriate according to unit guidelines. Sneaky behavior, depressed mood, bizarre behavior.
1/5/93. Mental Health Center reopens case: Reports self-mutilation, cutting self with knives. Will “trance out” since 5th grade – doesn’t have to deal with what’s going on. Says he thinks a lot about life after death–”I want to go where the monsters go.” He admits being caught with satanic items, but denies cult involvement.
Is interested in witchcraft for the past 8 years. He has tried to steal energy from someone else and influence others’ mind with witchcraft. Describes self as “pretty much hates the human race.” Relates that he feels people are in two classes–sheep and wolves (wolves eat the sheep).
1/13/93: Damien reports that he’s very angry with family members and with other people who have “let him down”. He discussed issues of power & control. He states that he could make things happen. Affect and mood was flat.
1/19/93: Reveals history of abuse as he talked of how he was treated as a child. States, “I just put it all inside.” Describes this as more than just anger – like rage. Sometimes he does “blow up.” Relates that when this happens, the only solution is to “hurt someone.” When questioned on his feelings he states, “I know I’m going to influence the world. People will remember me.”
1/20/93: Damien is an 18 year old, recently discharged from Charter Hospital. He’s had three psychiatric hospitalizations. Each has been associated with anger, thoughts of killing others, and thoughts of killing himself.
1/25/93: Speaks of rituals, drinking blood, more involved in demonology. Damien explained that he obtains his power by drinking blood of others. He typically drinks the blood of a sexual partner or of a ruling partner. This is achieved by biting or cutting. He states, “It makes me feel like a god.”
Damien describes drinking blood as giving him more power and strength. He remembers doing this as far back as age 10. He wants very much to be all powerful. He wants very much to be in total control.
Damien relates that a spirit is now living with him. The spirit was put inside him last year. He indicates that a month ago, the spirit decided to become part of him and he to become part of the spirit. This is reportedly a spirit of a woman who was killed by her husband. In addition, he also reports conversations with demons and other spirits. This is achieved through rituals.
He denies that he’s satanic, seeing himself more as being involved in demonology.
2/5/93: Damien is noted to have cuts on his right arm and hand. Related that he cut himself as a way of permanently marking his skin. Related feeling very angry yesterday when running into previous girlfriend. “I controlled it – I can do anything.”
5/5/93: At times he is impulsive and does things that may be harmful to him. He has impulses to do strange and harmful things.
And if all that wasn’t enuf……..
Statement of: Joe Houston Bartoush, Jr.
Route 2 Box 767 Lakeshore
DOB **-**-80 ***-****
On 10-27-92 I was at Lakeshore Trailer Park with Damien Echols when he killed a Black Great Dane. The dog was already sick and he hit the dog in the back of the head. He pulled the intestines out of the dog and started stomping the dog until blood came out of his mouth. He was going to come back later with battery acid so that he could burn the hair and skin off of the dog’s head. He had two cat skulls, a dog skull and a rat skull that I already knew about. He kept these skulls in his bedroom at Jack Echols house in Lakeshore. He was trying to make the eyeballs of the dog he killed pop out when he was stomping. Damien had a camoflouge survival knife to cut the guts out of the dog with. This statement was written by Det. Ridge at my request.
This statement was completed at 2:07 PM on the 14 day of June 1993.
Witness: Det. B. Ridge
X Joe Bartoush(Signature of person giving voluntary statement)
Witness: Hubert B. Bartoush
Oh….but wait…you said: Way more, as in taking out a book on black magic and calling himself a Wiccan like a million other teenagers were doing in the ’90s?
SHHHHH!!! You’d better to talk like that….Damien’s defense might hear you…..and they said that NO other kids were wearing black, into black magic or listening to Metallica….Only Damien and his buddies were and that’s why they were singled out. LOL!!!!
….and about Kay Ryan and the sexual persuasion…..sorry to disappoint but I’ve never heard of this person….sounds interesting tho!!
August 26th, 2008 at 11:10 am
The juvenile psychology of Echols isn’t evidence of murder. He was a depressed kid like a million other depressed kids, lashing out for attention. All this comes from Exhibit 500, which was only used the the sentencing phase of the trial, after he’d been convicted. Why is that? Because this information has nothing to do with guilt or innocence.
The only thread here that might be relevant is the great dane story, which if true would demonstrate a history of violent behavior, beyond superficial self-harm. But the statement comes from a child, taken at the height of the witch hunt. In Salem, circa 1692, you could have taken statements from dozens of kids saying they saw the witches fly. That’s the whole point.
Testimony from a child taken so far after the event is meaningless. Just a few weeks ago here in LA, some kids were playing in a tunnel they dug, and it collapsed, burying one of them. The other ran home crying, but instead of saying what really happened, he spun a tale of abduction, and the police went on a two-day manhunt, issuing an amber alert for a blue jeep, and posting police sketches of the guy that didn’t exist. Kids say the darndest things.
Yeah, the police found a great dane skull in Echols’ room. But what’s more likely, that a teenager interested in dark things found or bought a skull and the younger kid saw it and made up a story in the middle of a witch hunt — or Echols mutilated a dog in the middle of a trailer park, but no one ever found a body or filed a police report or said anything about the incident until 6 months later? Who’s dog was it? If someone killed my great dane, I’d be pissed.
Think about it for a second. Your arguments are the exact kind of sensationalist, illogical deductions that sent these three to jail. There is no direct evidence whatsoever. It’s all circumstantial, and even those arguments are weak.
September 23rd, 2008 at 3:45 pm
Your ” proof” that they did this onlythefacts is his mental history which proves NOTHING other than he had some mental history, which lets not forget JERRY DRIVER called the hospital many many times stating TO THEM that this kids was “psychotic” and a danger, yet time and time again if you look at the mental history reports on callahan you will see he was ONLY treated for depression. Lets say for Sh!ts and giggles it was more than depression AS STARTED IN HIS RECORDS, that still does not many Damien a killer. Sorry DNA excluded them. Facts are facts. Also lets not forget that JERRY DRIVER also called Oregon to tell them how DANGEROUS Damien was, Oregon didnt seem to think so, as they recomended that treatments stop at the age of 18 as they do not see him as a threat.
On another note, what about Terry Hobbs, whos DNA WAS found at the sceen of the crime along with his best friend David Jacoby, and people like YOU want to claim it to be secondary transfer, HA! Lets see, NO DNA linking the WM3 but DNA linking the step father and yet non supporters want to cry no way! HA!
How about Terry Hobbs telling police that he had his daughter Amanda with him while searching for Stevie? The neighbors came forward and said, no TERRY DROPPED AMANDA off with THEM during that time period. Only people who need to hide something need to lie.
You better go back and read all of exibit 500, along with the trial transcripts and the “confesion” ( that he got all wrong TWICE!). When you read it all and know the facts then you can sling your ” I burn myself with lighters” history. Buring yourself all day and night with lighters doesnt make you a murderer, but closed minded people like YOU dont get that. I’ve wasted enough time educating you and now Im finished.
September 25th, 2008 at 11:51 am
Oh…you must mean this hair:
The DEFENSE”S DNA EXPERT, Thomas Fedor at the “press conference”… the one who did the DNA report!
“The two hairs that I know about – the one that could have in fact come from Mr. Hobbs and the one that could have in fact come from David Jacoby – constitute what I call weak evidence. Because there are other people it could have come from and there isn’t any way to really prove our selection of possible sources for that hair. I don’t think – my personal opinion – I don’t think that that hair evidence would be enough to convict Mr. Hobbs or Mr. Jacoby or anyone that would be in a similar situation because it’s simply not strong enough. The percentages I gave of people who could be the source of those hairs are 1.5% of the population in the respect to one hair and 7% in respect to the other hair. That’s not particularly strong evidence and especially in the context of what most people are accustomed to with DNA testing. These odds are considerably weaker than what we would call an STR DNA test that virtually provides a source.”
Even the Defense’s DNA expert is saying that it is not a definite match to Terry Hobbs but what’s funnier(and what you fail to mention) is that the alleles were also consistent with the convicts so they would also be INCLUDED as possible donors.
Wow…sure sounds like someone is misinformed ..LOL….looks like you’re the one that needs to visit callahan’s my friend.
September 25th, 2008 at 11:59 am
oh….you must mean this hair eveidence:
The DEFENSE”S DNA EXPERT, Thomas Fedor at the “press conference”… the one who did the DNA report!
“The two hairs that I know about – the one that could have in fact come from Mr. Hobbs and the one that could have in fact come from David Jacoby – constitute what I call weak evidence. Because there are other people it could have come from and there isn’t any way to really prove our selection of possible sources for that hair. I don’t think – my personal opinion – I don’t think that that hair evidence would be enough to convict Mr. Hobbs or Mr. Jacoby or anyone that would be in a similar situation because it’s simply not strong enough. The percentages I gave of people who could be the source of those hairs are 1.5% of the population in the respect to one hair and 7% in respect to the other hair. That’s not particularly strong evidence and especially in the context of what most people are accustomed to with DNA testing. These odds are considerably weaker than what we would call an STR DNA test that virtually provides a source.”
Even the Defense attorneys are saying there is no direct match to Terry Hobbs but what’s funnier (and also what you fail to mention) is that the alleles that were consistent with the convicts which means they could also be potential donors.
Sounds like you are the one who’s got some reading to do my friend. LOL
September 25th, 2008 at 7:15 pm
GG says:
again if you look at the mental history reports on callahan you will see he was ONLY treated for depression.
________
hmmmm …..you might wanna take a second look at callahan…here I’ll help you cuz I’m just that nice:) http://callahan.8k.com/wm3/gwoods.html
You might find item “D” under the section “findings” of particular interest.
oh….and #45 under the section called “St. Vincent Hospital, Oregon, September 2 – 4, 1992″
hmmm….never diagnosed with more than depression…..LOL
July 11th, 2009 at 11:32 am
what??
you seriously wanna elevate damien echols, a troubled teen, over a DOZEN suspects? i’m talking about adults who are experienced in such kind of behaviour, and this crime HAD to be committed by someone who had such experience. THEY WERE NOT CAPABLE.
how can you even THINK of damien, or jason, or jessie, as a LEAD in this particular crime, a crime that has NOTHING to do with damien’s history, when you have actual child molesters, and i repeat that for you, CHILD MOLESTERS, guys who really did it, who crave more, ok? loitering around in EXACTLY that area. go watch acapulco h.e.a.t.
July 12th, 2009 at 3:03 pm
well if they didnt do it then why are they still in jail I am pretty sure that if they realy were innocent then they would have been let go and the right person or persons would be in jail but they must not be becouse if they were just some troubled kids they would be free becouse not all of justice system is corrupted
July 12th, 2009 at 3:08 pm
whos to say the step dad and his friend didnt help murder those kids since hellraiser says they were not capable
November 13th, 2009 at 11:00 am
This kid is completely guilty and the celebrity idiots who support him should be boycotted. Sucking blood…killing inncoent animals and cutting their guts out. I am liberal and not Christian, and I believe this sociopath should already be dead.
December 27th, 2009 at 9:32 pm
fuck
December 27th, 2009 at 9:53 pm
hey Tim,
sorry about the F word, I thought i was banned which I probably am but changed servers.
Well while I’m to speak I may as well take advantage of it.
The death penalty should be abolished because mistakes are made and even one it too many.
I’m not familiar with Echols case but I dislike cause celebs. For example I’m convinced Mumia is guilty of killing a young police officer, but because he’s a cool looking, charismatic guy everybodys ready to jump on the free Mumia bandwagon. The cops widow, who was fighting for her dead husbands justice got so many death threats from Mumia’s followers she had to move. they did a good job shutting her up.
Also I’m a lot more concerned about murderers who get off scott free or get light sentences. i couldnt’ the imagine the horror of having a loved one murdered, and watching the killer smiling as he walks out of court a free man.
And if we want to talk about injustice how about the Duke Lacrosse team. How about that farcial dog and pony show. That prosecter Nifong got away with murder, he just lost his license. You know when the DNA evidence exhonerated the players Nifong cried that he couldn’t try the case the old fashioned way (he liked playing the race card and stirring up a lynch mob mentality). its amazing all those libereal proffesors and students who wanted a hanging. its funny I consider myself a liberal too, but I’m not ignorant and I’ll state the truth when I see it.
Hey how much time do you think Bukowski should have gotten for “kicking his wife over and over. Well not the death penalty right Tim?
btw, a new American Dissident will be coming out, I wrote an essay about our encounter and my being banned, I’d send it to you but I’ll probably be banned or blocked. But who cares this is a lightweight blog for shallow thinkers, who quit when they’re losing a debate.
dave
December 28th, 2009 at 12:47 pm
I don’t know why you think you’re banned, but it’s pretty typical of the American Dissident to publish an essay that pisses and moans about something that isn’t true. There’s a comment policy here — comments have to be civil and relevant to the topic at hand. If they’re not, they get deleted, and if I have to go through the hassle of deleting too many, the screening system is temporarily turned on, so I don’t have to deal with it. No one’s been banned. I’m sure the AD essay will make that clear, LOL.
As for Echols, he’s not a celebrity. What makes his case important is that his entire sham of a trial was filmed for an HBO documentary, and so can be used as a tool for informing people of the failures of the criminal justice system.
To date, 139 innocent men and women have sat on death row before DNA evidence exonerated them. Hundreds of others have likely been put to death. Damian Echols is Troy Davis is countless other people.
Bukowski should be executed for drunkenly kicking at his wife, though. That’s totally what I said.
December 28th, 2009 at 5:08 pm
Hey Tim-if I wasn’t banned then I’m going to have my brain checked, I must be delusional, or my synaspes and nuerons aren’t firing correctly, maybe all that acid I took.
Too bad Bukowski’s already dead and can’t be executed.
dave
December 29th, 2009 at 12:30 am
I deleted yours and some other inappropriate comments, and set commenting to screen for a few days because I got tired of monitoring it. But to actually ban you I’d have to install a plug-in and set it up so I could, and I never bothered to.
December 30th, 2009 at 7:43 am
Hey Tim-well I’m a little hurt that I was actually too much trouble to ban.
Yeah, and I was advocating violence against women, that’s totally what I said.
dave